![]() ![]() |
|
The Case for Corporate BrandingBy Ray George An acquaintance recently asked me whether or not his company should leverage its corporate brand across a group of hotel brands within its portfolio. The specific issue had to do with scale – how could his company compete against the big chains when their individual brands did not have comparable recognition and reach? And isn't the corporate brand an easy way to demonstrate scale? The answer seems obvious – leverage the heck out of that corporate brand to get the scale and leverage to compete with the big chains, right? Not necessarily. What is not an option is to ignore your corporate brand, because whether you like it or not, a variety of audiences are already building associations and drawing conclusions from your brand. For example, financial and investor communities read about your corporate brand in the business section every day. Business professionals see your corporate brand rated in the American Consumer Satisfaction Index. And most importantly, your employees are looking for the guidance and leadership from their corporate office not only to understand business strategy but also to understand how the portfolio of brands is meant to work together. They also are expected to understand and live your corporate brand every day. How you leverage your corporate brand requires careful thought – but not thinking about your corporate brand can be extremely detrimental to your business. The bottom line is that corporate brands can have a significant impact on enhancing business results and boosting the stature of individual hotels if leveraged in creative and sophisticated ways. The critical factors to consider are:
Having analyzed such factors, the next step is to select the target audience or audiences for your corporate brand. And do not discount the power of your employees as a key target audience for your brand. Regardless of the hotel brand for which they work, the need to know that the values, promise and direction of the parent corporation is in sync with their goals. From there, consider the variety of options available to leverage your corporate brand. These options range from the dominant to the invisible, with a lot of interesting considerations in between.
Marriott has been extremely successful leveraging the power of its corporate brand to transfer equity of quality and consistency across hotels such as Courtyard. Outside of the hotel industry, some other interesting options emerge. Conde Nast employs a networked strategy, transferring equity across a wide range of magazines without drawing a close relationship to any one book. Companies such as Kelloggs and Nabisco use their corporate names as a symbolic “seal of approval” on all their product brands to demonstrate the quality and consistency of product, allowing individual brands the flexibility to target very specific consumer segments. Ingredient brands or branded benefits, such as Coolmax, the high-performance synthetic material used in athletic apparel, is used in a variety of clothes along with a variety of brands. An analogy in the hotel world is the Westin Heavenly Bed concept. If a corporate brand could lend credibility to these ingredient benefits, it could provide a link across your portfolio. But when looking at options, remember that this is not an all or nothing decision – there can be tremendous flexibility in the strategy you select. Sony uses almost every option across this spectrum in order to target customers and generate lifetime loyalty. From Sony Pictures, to Sony Walkman, to Metreon, to Pro Audio and Playstation, Sony leverages a variety of strategies to target a variety of customers. Each uses the Sony brand in an explicit or implicit way, taking into the consideration the factors discussed above. The corporate brand relationship should be flexible yet systematic in managing the dynamic strategies for corporate and hotel brands so that the whole becomes greater than the sum of its parts Finally, when this decision is made, document your compelling yet objective argument, because you will need to win over the most difficult audience – your employees. Brand name decisions, whether they are adding master brands, co-brands or endorsements to existing brands, require organization-wide buy-in to ensure consistency. But employees are emotionally tied to their brands – changing the name will make Getting back to the original question, you may be wondering what was my response was to my friend. I encouraged him to invest the time and energy into thinking through this decision strategically and thoroughly – the long-term impact will be significant. And I will keep a watchful eye on the results of his efforts. ### A version of this article was featured in the September, 2002 issue of National Hotel Executive magazine
Sign up to receive email updates of future Perspectives.
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|